Temppeliaukio Church (Helsinki)

Lutherinkatu 3, Helsinki
Tel. 09- 494 698
Trolley: 3B, 3T
Bus: 14, 14B, 18, 24, 39, 39A
Open: daily

Temppeliaukio church is the church of the Evangelical Lutheran Töölö parish near the center of Helsinki in Etu-Töölö. The building was completed in 1969. The rock-cut church was designed by Timo and Tuomo Suomalainen. The church has 750 seats. Thanks to its acoustic properties, the church is a popular venue for concerts.

 

History

Architectural competitions

The rocky area at the end of Fredrikinkatu was already reserved as the site of the church in the first approved site plan of the Arkadia area, or Etu-Töölö, in 1906. The name of the place Temppeliaukio and the name of the street surrounding it on the west and north, Temppelikatu, also date from that time. However, construction work was not started on the site for a long time. Later, three architectural competitions were organized for the design of the church, of which only the last one awarded the first prize.

In 1931, the Helsinki church council asked the city for a rocky plot of land named Temppeliaukio, where it planned to build the main church of Etu-Töölö, which would be formed as an independent parish in the future. In September 1932, an open architectural competition was announced for the sketches of the church building as well as the location of the church and the arrangement of the entire block area caused by it. By the deadline of January 25, 1933, 57 proposals were submitted for the competition. The first prize was not awarded at all, but two second prizes were. They went to the proposal of architects Kai and Dag Englund and to the proposal of architect Lars Björk. In both proposals, a traditional long church with a tower was proposed to be built, as was the proposal of Aarne Hytönen and Risto-Veikko Luukkonen, which came third, where the tower was replaced by a high end wall. The result of the competition did not completely satisfy the competition committee. The discussion continued in the bodies of the city of Helsinki, parishes and the Finnish Architects' Association.

In May 1936, a new open competition was announced, which ended in September of the same year. By the deadline, 23 proposals were submitted to the competition. The first prize was not awarded in this competition either. Of the second prizes awarded, one went to architect Martti Välikangas and the other to architects Aarne Ervi and Toivo Paatela and their assistants. The runners-up, as well as Professor J. S. Sirén's proposal, which came in third, were long churches, all of which have a tower. In those that won the second prize, the tower is detached from the church itself, in Sirén's proposal it is part of the church hall building. Sirén's cathedral-type church, which ranked third, best met the wishes of the parish representatives, so the proposal was approved by the Church Council as the basis for the work. Excavation began in November 1939, but the winter war stopped the work after only three days. The war was followed by a long period of reconstruction in Finland, when the construction of the church was not continued. The social expectations and architectural goals and stylistic trends for the parishes changed, so the church council decided in 1959 to give up Sirén's expensive and outdated church plan in 1959.

The third open architecture competition was announced to be held from 8 August 1960 to 15 January 1961. According to the competition program, the proposal "should include the entire layout plan of Temppeliaukio, including park areas and parking spaces, taking into account that as much of the rocky area of the square as possible could be preserved". By the deadline, the competition received 67 proposals. The competition result was announced on April 19, 1961. The award committee unanimously awarded the first prize to the proposal Kivikirkko. The architect brothers Timo Suomalainen and Tuomo Suomalainen were revealed behind the name tag. In their proposal, the rocky nature of the square has been preserved by making the church out of the rock itself: the hall is sunk into the middle of the rock and the parish facilities are placed on the edges of the dome to accompany its shape.

The second prize went to architect Eero Eerikäinen and architecture student Jukka Salokari for the proposal Sanctitas. In this proposal, the square is dominated by a tall church building. Award committee member Heikki Castrén said the best aspects of the work when presenting the proposal for a modern cathedral created with the most exciting methods of contemporary architecture. The third place went to the proposal Seinät, which was created by architect Ahti Korhonen and his assistants. According to Castrén, this proposal was the stark contrast to the work that won the second prize. Its architecture is monastically barren, and in it a rock would remain a rock.

 

The winning proposal

As the basis of the work, the award committee proposed the proposal of Suomalainen veljesten, which was unanimously selected as the winner. The award committee's statement on the Kivikirkko proposal, recorded in the evaluation minutes, reads in its entirety as follows:

"Basically, the proposal follows a line that has appeared before when competing for a church to be built on this site, but is still completely original as a composition. By designing the parish premises as a low structure that curves around the rock, the impression has been created where the rock area in its entire extent forms an intact sacral area. The overall solution has been sensitively adapted to the original shape of the terrain, enhancing it. Public access is organized directly from the street level; the church hall is also connected by a tunnel to the parish facilities. The Finnish and Swedish congregations each form their own entity. Their internal organization is in principle correctly resolved, although sketchy in details. The basic outline of the proposal offers an opportunity for its further development. For example, by moving the church structure somewhat closer to the parish premises, excavation could be reduced and the underground connection shortened. The interior of the church is delicate both in its forms and its lighting. However, the roof structure needs more detailed technical investigation. The proposal offers an architecturally beautiful view from all sides. The design of the bell tower is not at the level of the rest of the plan."

At the beginning of the statement, the board refers to the proposal of Pauli Blomstedt, who participated unsuccessfully in the 1932–1933 competition. In both of P.E. Blomstedt's and the Suomalainen brothers' plans, the rock has been given an absolute main role, however in a completely different way: Blomstedt's with maximum conservation of the rock and Suomalainen's with minimal alteration of the rock. This becomes clear when you get to know the completed church and Blomstedt's drawings kept in the Museum of Finnish Architecture (especially a drawing of the main facade of the church - the entrance page from the direction of Oksasenkatu and Sammonkatu and a drawing of the location of the church in the rocky area). For Blomstedt, the overall artistic structure is created from the contrast between the rock and the building, while for the Suomalainen brothers, it is created from the harmonious dialogue between the rock and the building masses that are related to the forms of nature. The choice of a roof dome – an ancient sacral space structure – as the roof of the hall in both proposals causes the part of the arc of a circle to become the focus of attention in both plans in the facade and section drawings. However, the domes are completely different. Blomstedt's dome is a reduced, completely opaque glass brick and an emphasized technical, pure contrast to nature. It visually separates those in the hall from the rock and the rest of the environment to their own peace. The Finns' dome aims to connect the outside and inside space and thus offer those in the hall space the opportunity to experience freedom in addition to the sense of security created by the rock.

Rock mining starts from a completely different basis in these proposals. Blomstedt places his church on the square in a place where it can fit next to the rock with as little excavation as possible. Suomalainen's brothers placed the church in the center of the rock, which is advantageous in terms of traffic and in the most hierarchically valuable place in the square. Their basic idea was to make a church for Temppeliaukio out of the rock itself.

 

Implementation

Getting the church to Temppeliaukio in the cultural climate of the 1960s took nine years, including the competition period. The press actively participated in the uproar around the project by writing about the "anti-devil bunker", "million church" and "giant investment". The church council had roughly the same number of opponents as supporters of the project. The situation led to the decision to eliminate two-thirds of the parish facilities according to the competition program. The size and shape of the church hall itself remained somewhat unchanged.

Apart from the reduction of the space program, which came as a setback, the changes were, according to the architects, mainly the natural development of the plan. One of the most significant changes from an architectural point of view became possible when the brothers had the opportunity to present their idea, which had already arisen while doing the competition work, to have the walls of the hall made of rock surfaces instead of concrete. However, the brothers had abandoned this idea during the competition phase, fearing the jury's reaction.

After the competition, experts from different fields were included in the design group. Acoustician Mauri Parjo demanded box-like structures on the underside of the roof dome. An aesthetically acceptable solution was found when the brothers came up with designing a copper strip cladding below the box structures. The acoustician wanted different sized folding surfaces for the concrete walls of the hall. Conductor Paavo Berglund had also told the brothers that acoustically good music halls have vaults and other subjects that strongly shape the surface. The brothers noticed that the idea of a rock wall excavated to a living surface, which remained in their minds, would be by far the most natural solution, both visually and acoustically. They presented their proposal first to the acoustician and then to the building committee, which asked for opinions from all the specialist designers. They were in favor and the committee accepted the rock wall idea.

Construction of the church began in February 1968 and it was inaugurated on September 28, 1969 under the name Taivallahti Church. In 1971, the name was officially changed to Temppeliaukio church. The price of the church with its furnishings came to about four million marks, which was more or less the same as the price of a public school of the same size in Helsinki.

 

Student protest

During the construction period, the church aroused conflicting feelings. A group of ten members of the Student Christian Association, led by Seppo Kjellberg, painted with white paint on the night of July 16 and 17, 1968, the "Biafra" texts that take a stand on rock and concrete castings in eleven places to remind us of the hunger problem in Africa. The case attracted great attention and made it to the front pages of the newspapers. It was noted that the student radicalism had now also taken believers with it. In January 1969, the Helsinki Court of Appeal sentenced the Biafra painters to fines. They were imposed on everyone, the smallest fine was 10 marks and the largest was 100 marks. They also had to pay the court costs of the city and the parish, 160 marks each. In the end, "an influential group of supporters, up to the bishops" collected the money needed for these fees, so the students did not have to pay them themselves. There is still one Biafra painting in the basement of the church.

 

Architecture and interior design

You enter the space excavated in the bedrock without going up the stairs directly from the street level. The free-form oval church hall is bathed in daylight between the rock wall and the roof dome thanks to the skylight area of variable width. In the window area, the dome is supported by 180 radial beams of different lengths. Both the beams and the supporting structure of the dome are reinforced concrete. The dome is the only mathematical shape in the hall. The amount of light is distributed to different parts of the hall according to their mutual ranking. Thus, the skylight gives the most valuable venue, i.e. the altar area, the most light compared to other parts of the hall, emphasizing the work of art created by the rock crack, the cross and the altar structures. The cladding surfaces of the dome and the gallery are unpatinated copper: in the dome a slotted strip and in the galleries a sheet bent into a pontoon panel. The floor is polished concrete, the pulpit is reinforced concrete, as well as the base structures of the gallery, which contain the scat and ventilation ducts.

The interior colors designed by Finns are based on granite tones: red, blue-red and gray. The crucifix, candlesticks and baptismal bowl were forged by the artist Kauko Moisio. The textiles were designed by the artist Tellervo Strömmer. The organ was made by Urkurakentamo Veikko Virtanen. There are 43 voices and 3001 whistles. The layout of the organ is the handiwork of the church's architects.

A total of 940 people can be in the hall at the same time. Some of the seats are placed in the gallery, which also has three other important functions. The loggia separates the hall from the hall and improves the acoustics by dispersing the sound in the hall and absorbing it in the hall. In addition, fresh air is blown in through the gallery. Exhaust air and water coming from the rock are directed from the gap between the floor and the rock to the ducts and pipes under the floor.

The parish hall on the second floor of the edge building can accommodate 130 people. The church is often used as a concert hall due to its excellent acoustics. There is a stepped podium for the choir, and a floor area is reserved for the orchestra, which is usually a seating area with movable chairs. In addition to concerts, Temppeliaukio's church has performed, among other things, the semi-dramatic version of the opera The Last Temptations in 2007. Temppeliaukio is also popular as a wedding church. There are no bells in Temppeliaukio, but the chimes of the bells, composed by professor Taneli Kuusisto, echo from the tape through the loud speakers in the outer stone wall.

 

Tourist attraction

In 2018, 850,000 tourists visited the church in Temppeliaukio. Based on the number of visitors, it is the most popular architectural attraction in Finland and the third most popular tourist attraction in Helsinki after Linnanmäki and Suomenlinna. In the summer, up to 10,000 people visit the church daily. A large part of the visitors are cruise tourists and Asian group tourists. There has been an entrance fee of three euros to the church in Temppeliaukio since 2017, and in 2018, tourists brought 1,643,000 euros in ticket revenue to the church.

As the only destination from Finland, Temppeliaukio church (under the name Taivallahti church) has been included in the Italian work series I Cento Monumenti (Finnish World Sights, 1980). According to the work, in the church of Temppeliaukio, reason and rationality created an ideal place for those "mysterious phenomena that escape rational explanations, where the most modern and the most primitive materials together formed a new environment: a place for prayer was born that is completely sheltered..., flooded with light, beautiful and thoroughly 'rational'".

Temppeliaukio's church was protected in 2004. In the conservation presentation, the Museum Agency states, among other things: "Temppeliaukio's church is a distinctive building, strongly associated as a product of the Finnish spirit, which sits organically in a compact square surrounded by red-brick workers' housing blocks. Granite, as the church's most visible material, creates both a natural and permanent impression, which the copper roof, upper glass band and concrete entrance complementary".

The church was closed for renovation from the end of 2010 to June 2011, and even after that the renovation continued, although tourists were already allowed in during the summer. The air conditioning, heating system and sound system were renewed in the church. The wooden parts of the benches were renovated, and the upholstery was replaced with fuchsia red fabric. The former vicar's office room was turned into a bridal room, as the church is a popular marriage church. In the bridal room, there is a wedding curtain designed by Tellervo Strömmer, woven at the Wetterhoff home industry college.

Since October 2011, buses used by tourists have had to park 400 meters away on Eteläinen Rautatiekatu. Due to years of complaints, parking is no longer allowed near the church.

 

The threat of a terrorist act in the summer of 2017

In June 2017, there was news about the threat of a terrorist attack against the church in Temppeliaukio, which is why stout concrete pigs were brought in front of the church's entrance. In the spring and early summer of 2017, there were terrorist attacks in Europe, the perpetrators of which drove cars into large crowds. According to eyewitnesses, on June 18, 2017, a large-scale police operation was underway in the immediate vicinity of the Temppeliaukio church. According to the police, the operation was related to the arrest of a person suspected of a crime, but the matter was not commented on in more detail. Later, the police said that the suspect had not been reached. Although the terrorist threat against the church turned out to be baseless, it was decided that the concrete pigs would remain in place. The security practices of the church were also tightened so that bringing large bags and briefcases into the church was prohibited.