Alexander Kolevatov

Alexander Sergeyevich Kolevatov was one of the nine hikers who perished in the Dyatlov Pass Incident in February 1959, a tragic and mysterious event in the Ural Mountains of the Soviet Union that remains one of history’s most perplexing unsolved cases. A reserved yet highly capable member of Igor Dyatlov’s expedition team, Kolevatov brought technical expertise and a unique background in nuclear physics to the group.

 

Background and Early Life

Alexander Kolevatov was born on November 16, 1934, in Sverdlovsk (now Yekaterinburg), Sverdlovsk Oblast, Soviet Union. Growing up in an industrial city during the post-World War II era, he was part of a generation shaped by Soviet emphasis on scientific advancement, education, and resilience. Little is documented about his family, but his urban upbringing in a working-class or middle-class household likely provided access to educational opportunities that fueled his academic pursuits.

Kolevatov initially studied at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, a prestigious institution, before transferring to the Ural Polytechnical Institute in Sverdlovsk, where he pursued a degree in physics, specializing in metallurgy or nuclear-related fields. His transfer may have been motivated by personal or logistical reasons, but it placed him in the same academic and social circles as Igor Dyatlov and other expedition members. By 1959, Kolevatov was 24 years old, a recent graduate or final-year student, and had gained practical experience working at a nuclear research facility, possibly Chelyabinsk-40 (now Ozersk), a secretive Soviet site involved in plutonium production for atomic weapons. This exposure to radiation later became significant in theories about the incident.

An active member of the Ural Polytechnical Institute’s hiking and skiing club, Kolevatov developed a passion for mountaineering and backcountry skiing, balancing his intellectual pursuits with physical challenges. His experience in the Ural Mountains, combined with his technical skills, made him a valuable candidate for the Category III expedition to Otorten Mountain in January–February 1959, a 300-kilometer ski trek led by Igor Dyatlov.

 

Personality and Relationships

Alexander Kolevatov was described by friends and fellow hikers as quiet, analytical, and dependable. Unlike the more outgoing members like Yuri Doroshenko or Zinaida Kolmogorova, Kolevatov was introspective, often preferring to observe rather than dominate conversations. His reserved nature masked a sharp intellect and a methodical approach to problem-solving, qualities likely honed by his physics training and nuclear work. Expedition diaries and accounts note his reliability, as he consistently contributed to the group’s efforts without seeking attention.

Physically, Kolevatov was of average build but fit, capable of enduring the physical demands of skiing through deep snow and high altitudes. Photos from the expedition show him focused and composed, often engaged in tasks like setting up camp or handling equipment. His technical expertise made him a natural collaborator with Nicolai Thibeaux-Brignolle, another engineer, and Igor Dyatlov, the group’s leader.

Kolevatov had professional and respectful relationships with his teammates. He was close to Thibeaux-Brignolle, sharing a mutual interest in technical challenges, and worked well under Dyatlov’s leadership. His interactions with Zinaida Kolmogorova and Lyudmila Dubinina were cordial, though less personal than those of the more extroverted members. He also connected with Semyon Zolotaryov, the oldest member, possibly due to their shared experience in high-stakes environments (Zolotaryov’s military background and Kolevatov’s nuclear work). Kolevatov’s understated presence made him a stabilizing force within the group’s diverse dynamics.

 

Role in the 1959 Expedition

Kolevatov was one of ten members of the Dyatlov group’s expedition, which began on January 25, 1959, aiming to ski approximately 300 kilometers (186 miles) to Otorten Mountain in the northern Ural Mountains. The team included eight men (Igor Dyatlov, Yuri Yudin, Yuri Doroshenko, Alexander Kolevatov, Georgy Krivonischenko, Rustem Slobodin, Nicolai Thibeaux-Brignolle, and Semyon Zolotaryov) and two women (Zinaida Kolmogorova and Lyudmila Dubinina). Yuri Yudin turned back on January 28 due to illness, leaving nine hikers to continue.

Kolevatov’s role was that of a technical specialist and reliable team member. His physics background and nuclear work experience likely made him adept at handling equipment, such as the group’s stove or navigation tools, and assessing environmental conditions. He may have contributed to decisions about route planning or campsite safety, given his analytical skills. Diaries and photos show him actively participating in skiing, camp setup, and group activities, often working alongside Thibeaux-Brignolle or Dyatlov. His reserved demeanor did not diminish his contributions, as he was trusted to handle critical tasks.

On February 1, 1959, the group pitched their tent on the slopes of Kholat Syakhl (“Dead Mountain”), a location exposed to harsh winds and potential snow hazards. Kolevatov, with his technical expertise, likely assisted in securing the tent, a task executed with precision, as evidenced by its condition when found by rescuers. That night, an unknown catastrophe struck, leading to the deaths of all nine hikers.

 

Circumstances of His Death

When the group failed to return as scheduled, a search and rescue operation began in mid-February 1959. On February 26, rescuers found the tent, cut open from the inside, with most belongings, including shoes and warm clothing, left behind. Footprints led 1.5 kilometers to a cedar tree, where Yuri Doroshenko and Georgy Krivonischenko were found, partially clothed, near a small fire. Other bodies were discovered over the following weeks, revealing a complex and tragic scene.

Alexander Kolevatov’s body was found on May 4, 1959, in a ravine 75 meters from the cedar tree, alongside Nicolai Thibeaux-Brignolle, Semyon Zolotaryov, and Lyudmila Dubinina, collectively known as the “ravine group.” Unlike his companions in the ravine, Kolevatov died of hypothermia, with no significant internal injuries. His body showed minor abrasions on his hands and face, and his neck was twisted, possibly due to rigor mortis, a fall, or post-mortem positioning. He was dressed in multiple layers of clothing, including a jacket and pants, some of which belonged to other hikers, suggesting he took clothing from the deceased to stay warm, indicating he may have survived longer than others in the ravine.

Kolevatov was found lying close to Zolotaryov, with his arms around or near him, possibly in an attempt to share warmth or assist him. His lack of severe trauma, unlike Thibeaux-Brignolle’s skull fracture, Zolotaryov’s rib fractures, and Dubinina’s crushed chest, is a notable anomaly in the ravine group. Trace radiation was detected on some clothing in the ravine, including Dubinina’s, which may relate to Kolevatov’s nuclear work or environmental factors in the Urals.

The official Soviet investigation concluded that the hikers died due to a “compelling natural force,” but the vague explanation left many questions unanswered. Kolevatov’s relatively intact condition, compared to the ravine group’s severe injuries, has puzzled researchers, suggesting he may have avoided the initial trauma that struck his companions. A 2021 study supporting the avalanche theory posits that a small slab avalanche caused the group to flee, with the ravine group falling into the ravine, but Kolevatov’s lack of injuries challenges this explanation. The absence of avalanche debris in 1959 and the slope’s low angle (15–20 degrees) further complicate the theory.

 

Theories and Speculation

Kolevatov’s death, as part of the ravine group but without severe injuries, is a key piece of the Dyatlov Pass puzzle. His nuclear background and the radiation traces on nearby clothing have fueled speculation. Key hypotheses include:

Avalanche: The 2020 Russian investigation and 2021 studies suggest a slab avalanche prompted the group to cut open the tent and flee. Kolevatov may have escaped the initial impact in the ravine, dying of hypothermia later. His lack of trauma, unlike his ravine companions, raises questions about his position during the event. Critics note the slope’s angle and lack of debris.
Military Involvement: Kolevatov’s nuclear work and the radiation traces on Dubinina’s clothing (possibly Krivonischenko’s) support theories of a military test, such as a radiological or explosive device. His intact condition suggests he was not directly hit by the force that injured others, but his proximity to radiated clothing keeps this theory alive. No documents confirm military activity.
Infrasound or Panic: Infrasound from wind patterns may have caused disorientation, leading to a chaotic escape. Kolevatov’s survival longer than others in the ravine, as inferred from his clothing layers, suggests he remained coherent, but this theory doesn’t explain the ravine group’s injuries.
Foul Play: Theories of an attack by locals, prisoners, or Soviet agents cite the ravine injuries, but Kolevatov’s lack of trauma undermines this. His nuclear background has sparked speculation about espionage, though no evidence supports this.
Paranormal or Extraterrestrial: Speculative theories link the radiation and ravine injuries to UFOs or supernatural forces, often citing reports of lights in the sky. These lack credible evidence, with Kolevatov’s nuclear work offering a more plausible radiation source.
Kolevatov’s proximity to Zolotaryov and his extra clothing suggest he was among the last in the ravine to die, possibly attempting to help or survive longer. The radiation traces, while significant, are likely explained by his or Krivonischenko’s nuclear work or environmental contamination in the Urals, a region with known radiological activity.

 

Legacy and Impact

Alexander Kolevatov is remembered as a quiet, intelligent, and reliable member of the Dyatlov expedition, whose life was cut short in a tragedy that defies explanation. His nuclear background and lack of severe injuries make him a unique figure in the narrative, often overlooked compared to the more dramatic cases of Dubinina or Zolotaryov but critical to understanding the group’s final moments. Photos of Kolevatov, preserved by the Dyatlov Foundation, show him focused and engaged, capturing the group’s camaraderie before the tragedy.

The Dyatlov Foundation, established by survivors’ families and the Ural Polytechnical Institute, maintains Kolevatov’s memory through archives, including diaries and photos. His technical expertise and reserved nature are celebrated as part of the group’s diverse strengths. The 2013 film Devil’s Pass, while fictional, draws loosely on the incident, with characters inspired by hikers like Kolevatov. His nuclear work has fueled speculation, but it also underscores his intellectual contributions to Soviet science.

Kolevatov’s death continues to be studied, particularly his lack of trauma in the ravine group, which challenges avalanche and military theories. The 2019 Russian reopening of the case, concluding in 2020 with an avalanche explanation, has not fully resolved questions about his condition, keeping his story alive in books, documentaries, and podcasts. His legacy is tied to the human cost of the tragedy and the enduring quest for answers, with the Dyatlov Pass serving as a memorial to him and his companions.

 

Personal Details and Anecdotes

Nuclear Expertise: Kolevatov’s work at a nuclear facility, possibly Chelyabinsk-40, exposed him to radiation, a detail that later fueled theories about the incident’s radiation traces.
Reserved Nature: Diaries and accounts describe Kolevatov as a quiet observer, contributing through actions rather than words, often working alongside Thibeaux-Brignolle.
Survival Instincts: His extra clothing layers and position near Zolotaryov suggest he fought to survive, possibly assisting others in the ravine before succumbing to hypothermia.
Technical Skills: His physics background likely made him a key contributor to equipment maintenance and campsite decisions, though specific actions are undocumented.