• Home
• Europe
• Italy
• Pompeii
• Regio IX

House of the Centennial, Pompeii

Address: Regio IX, Insula 8
Area: 2175 square meters
Rooms: +40

The House of the Centenary, also known as Casa del Centenario or Domus A. Rustii Veri e Tiberius Claudi Veri (Regio IX, Insula 8, Entrances 3 and 6; IX.8.3/6), is one of the largest and most luxurious domestic structures in Pompeii, covering an estimated 1,800-2,000 square meters with over 40 rooms. Built in the mid-2nd century BC during the Samnite period, it underwent significant renovations in the Imperial era (1st century AD), incorporating Hellenistic influences like a grand peristyle and private amenities. The house exemplifies elite Roman domestic architecture, blending public reception spaces with private luxuries such as baths, a nymphaeum (fountain shrine), a fish pond (piscina), and two atria. It is divided into a main section for the owner's family and separate servants' quarters with its own entrance from a side street (IX.8.a). Ownership is attributed to the prominent Verus family, specifically Aulus Rustius Verus (a candidate for aedile and duumvir) and Tiberius Claudius Verus (supreme magistrate in AD 61-62), based on electoral graffiti on the facade. Buried under ash and pumice during the 79 AD eruption of Mount Vesuvius, the house was preserved until its excavation in 1879—exactly 1,800 years after the disaster, inspiring its modern name. Today, it is part of the Pompeii Archaeological Park, open to visitors, though some areas show damage from World War II bombings and ongoing conservation challenges.

Historical Context and Excavations

Discovery and Naming
Archaeologists uncovered the house in 1879 during systematic excavations in Pompeii’s Regio IX under the direction of Michele Ruggiero (with further work in 1881 and 1902). The timing was deliberate: 1879 marked exactly 1,800 years (the 18th centenary) since the 79 AD eruption that buried the city under ash and pumice. Italian excavators named it Casa del Centenario to commemorate this anniversary, reflecting the era’s growing national interest in Pompeii following Italian unification.

Pre-Eruption History and Construction Phases
The house was originally constructed in the mid-2nd century BC (around 150 BC) during Pompeii’s Samnite period, when the city was under Oscan influence before full Roman control. It belongs to the so-called “tufa period” of Pompeian architecture, characterized by fine-grained gray volcanic tufa stone quarried near Nuceria (modern Nocera). This material allowed for elegant, Hellenized designs influenced by Greek architecture, which wealthy Pompeian elites adopted.
It ranks among the city’s grandest homes, spanning a large footprint with features that signaled extreme wealth: two atria (courtyards for rainwater collection and reception), a peristyle garden with a double order of columns, private baths, a nymphaeum (ornamental fountain grotto), and a fish pond (piscina). A separate service wing (with its own entrance from a side street) housed servants and included a bakery in the cellar.
Major remodeling occurred around 15 AD, when the bath complex, swimming pool, and nymphaeum were added—likely to emulate the latest imperial luxury trends under the early Julio-Claudian emperors. Further redecoration in the Third and Fourth Pompeian styles happened in the decades leading up to the eruption, updating walls with vibrant mythological and garden scenes.

Ownership
The precise owner remains uncertain but is strongly linked to the Verus family through extensive graffiti on the façade and interior. Prominent candidates include Aulus Rustius Verus (often called A. Rustius Verus), a local politician who served as aedile (magistrate responsible for public works) and was a candidate for duumvir (one of the two chief magistrates). Another figure mentioned is Tiberius Claudius Verus (or Ti. Claudius Verus), who held the highest magistracy around 61–62 AD. Scholars like Matteo Della Corte proposed the house as the Domus A. Rustii Veri e Tiberii Claudi Veri, suggesting it may have belonged to related or co-resident elite families.
Electoral graffiti and other inscriptions (including one on a millstone) support Aulus Rustius Verus as the likely primary resident or patron; he was evidently a prominent figure who sponsored public works or bakeries elsewhere in Pompeii. The house’s scale and private amenities align with the lifestyle of a wealthy politician and merchant family.

Decorations, Frescoes, and Artifacts
The house preserves an extraordinary collection of wall paintings, many now in the National Archaeological Museum of Naples. The most famous is the lararium fresco from the secondary atrium—the earliest known artistic depiction of Mount Vesuvius. It shows the volcano as a single, vine-covered peak (pre-eruption profile, unlike today’s double cone) with vineyards in neat quincunx patterns, woods, and a grape-bodied Bacchus (Dionysus) holding a thyrsus, accompanied by a panther and a crested serpent (possibly Agathodaemon). This fresco, now in Naples, captures the fertile pre-eruption landscape described by ancient writers like Plutarch and Martial.

Other notable frescoes include:
Mythological scenes: Theseus and the Minotaur, Hermaphroditus and Silenus, Hercules and Telephus, Orestes and Pylades before Thoas, Selene and Endymion, Venus Piscatrix (“Venus the Fisherwoman”), and scenes possibly inspired by theater (e.g., Medea, Iphigenia in Tauris, or Euripides/Seneca’s Hercules Furens).
Hunting scenes attributed to the Pompeian painter Lucius.
Delicate decorative motifs: candelabra, ivy vines, birds, cupids harvesting grapes, and theatrical allusions.
Erotic frescoes: A secluded bedroom (Room 43, accessed via the smaller atrium) features two highly explicit symplegma (intercourse) scenes in everyday domestic settings—one with a woman on top wearing only a breast band (strophium), another in the rarer “reverse upright Venus” position. Scholars debate whether this was a private “sex club” for elite parties (with a possible voyeur peephole) or simply a luxurious cubiculum with typical Roman erotic art.

Artifacts and graffiti add personal touches: a latrine graffito using the rare verb cacaturit (“wants to shit,” also in Martial), a slave’s escape note dated November 6 in the consulship of Drusus Caesar and M. Junius Silanus (15 AD), and theatrical references like histrionica Actica (“Actica the pantomime actress”).

Post-Discovery and Legacy
After excavation, many frescoes were detached and moved to Naples for preservation, while the structure itself has undergone periodic conservation. The house offers a vivid window into elite Roman domestic life: political ambition, luxury, leisure, mythology, and even the looming presence of Vesuvius (ironically depicted in its fertile glory inside a home that would soon be buried by it). Today it remains a key stop for visitors to Pompeii, illustrating the city’s transition from Samnite roots to Roman imperial splendor before its sudden end.

Architectural Layout

Construction History and Materials
The core of the house dates to the mid-2nd century BC, belonging to the luxurious “tufa period” of Pompeian architecture. Builders used fine-grained gray volcanic tufa quarried near Nuceria for structural elements such as walls, columns, and doorframes—characteristic of high-status Samnite-era homes. This material provided both durability and a refined aesthetic.
Around 15 AD (early Imperial period under Tiberius or early Claudius), the house underwent significant remodeling: the private bath complex and swimming pool (piscina) were added, along with expansions that fused it with adjacent properties (linked to IX.8.3, IX.8.8, IX.8.a, and IX.8.c). In the final years before 79 AD, several rooms received extensive redecoration in the Third and Fourth Pompeian styles. The house shows clear zoning: grand public/family areas versus service quarters, reflecting Roman social hierarchy.

Overall Layout and Organization
The house is a complex domus formed by merging several earlier residences, resulting in two atria, a large peristyle garden, private baths, a nymphaeum, and distinct family versus servant zones with separate street entrances. It follows the classic Roman domus progression—fauces → atrium → tablinum/peristyle—but on a grand scale with added luxury features.

Main Entrance (IX.8.6 on Via di Nola): A wide doorway (often flanked by benches) leads through a narrow fauces (entrance corridor) paved with mosaics, including a striking black-and-white motif of a dolphin chased by a seahorse. This sets a luxurious tone immediately.
Primary (Tuscan) Atrium: The grander of the two, this open-roofed space (compluvium) features a central impluvium basin for rainwater collection, with channels and opus signinum waterproofing. The floor is mosaic-paved. Alae (side recesses/rooms) flank it (e.g., east ala with painted mythological scenes like Diana/Artemis). It served as the formal reception area, leading to the tablinum and peristyle.
Secondary Atrium: Smaller and more private (possibly tetrastyle, supported by four tufa columns), it likely handled family and service access. It contains a lararium (household shrine) with the famous fresco of Mount Vesuvius as a vineyard-covered peak (now in the National Archaeological Museum of Naples) alongside Bacchus and other figures.

From the atria, the layout flows into corridors (andron or service passages), a tablinum (formal reception room behind the main atrium), triclinia (dining rooms, including a large one with views into the garden and nymphaeum), exedrae, diaetae (reclining/summer rooms), and numerous cubicula (bedrooms). The eastern section includes a bedroom with explicit erotic frescoes (symplegmata scenes).

Peristyle and Garden Features
The spacious peristyle garden forms the heart of the house, surrounded by porticoes on all four sides (east, north, south, west). It features a double order of columns at the front (a more elaborate Hellenistic-influenced design), with approximately 22 columns in total (often white stucco over red bases, some with wooden fencing elements). The garden included plantings, a fish pond (piscina), and a swimming pool added in the Imperial remodeling.
The peristyle creates an illusion of a country villa through integrated architecture and painting. A service corridor runs alongside key features.

Nymphaeum
At the rear of the peristyle lies a particularly beautiful nymphaeum (ornamental fountain/grotto structure) with a real fountain and basin. It masterfully blends real architecture (tiers for cascading water, parapets, statue bases) with trompe-l’œil frescoes: painted fish and marine life in the pool, balustrades with ivy/birds/lizards, garden scenes, sphinx fountains, river gods, and viticulture motifs (cupids harvesting grapes). This creates a immersive “grotesque potpourri” of nature and luxury, evoking a sacred spring or rural idyll.

Private Baths and Service Areas
The bath suite (added ~15 AD) is a self-contained luxury:
Apodyterium (changing room)
Frigidarium with cold plunge pool
Tepidarium (warm room)
Caldarium (hot/steam room)
Praefurnium (furnace) for hypocaust heating

These connect via corridors to the main house. Servant quarters occupy the west side, with their own atrium, separate side-street entrance (e.g., IX.8.a), kitchen, latrine, bakery, and lararium. Stairs indicate an upper floor in parts of the house.

Architectural Significance
The House of the Centenary showcases the peak of Pompeian domestic architecture: functional zoning for otium (leisure) and negotium (business), advanced water management (impluvia, fountains, baths), and seamless integration of structure with Fourth-Style illusionistic painting. Its scale, private bathing facilities, and nymphaeum reflect the wealth of owners (likely the Verus family, based on façade graffiti naming candidates for office). Like other elite Pompeian homes, it prioritizes light, views (e.g., triclinium aligned for garden vistas), and sensory luxury while maintaining traditional Italic elements.
Much of the original decoration (frescoes, mosaics) survives in situ or in museums, but the architecture itself—tufa construction, columned porticoes, and hydraulic features—remains a prime example of how Roman elites adapted Hellenistic and local traditions into opulent urban villas.