• Home
• Europe
• Italy
• Pompeii

House of Zephir and Flora, Pompeii

Address: Insula 10
Area: 638 square meters
Rooms: 10

The House of Zephyr and Flora in Pompeii, located at Via della Fortuna Augusta (archaeological designation VI.14.1), is a modest yet intriguing example of a Roman domus from the ancient city buried by Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE. Known by several names—House of the Ship (Casa del Naviglio), House of Zefiro e Clori, House of Tintirius, and House of the Bacchae—it derives its primary title from frescoes depicting the mythological figures Zephyr (the west wind) and Flora (the goddess of flowers and spring). Excavated in the 1820s, the house reflects Samnite origins with later Roman modifications, but its current state of disrepair underscores the challenges of preserving Pompeii’s ruins.

Historical Context

The House of Zephyr and Flora likely dates to the 3rd or 2nd century BCE, during Pompeii’s Samnite period, a time when the city was influenced by the Italic Samnite people before Roman colonization in 80 BCE. Its initial construction as a Samnite house suggests it was built for a local family of moderate means, distinct from the grand villas of the Roman elite like the House of the Faun. Over time, it underwent renovations, particularly in the 1st century BCE, reflecting Roman architectural and decorative trends. By 79 CE, when Vesuvius erupted, the house was already centuries old, possibly repurposed or adapted to new owners.

The multiple names assigned to the house stem from its frescoes and artifacts, which early archaeologists interpreted in various ways. “Zephyr and Flora” refers to a mythological scene, while “House of the Ship” may relate to nautical imagery or nearby structures. “Tintirius” and “Bacchae” likely derive from speculative associations with owners or Bacchic (Dionysian) themes, though no definitive inscriptions confirm ownership. The house’s excavation in the 1820s, during the Bourbon era of exploration, was marred by looting and exposure to the elements, leading to significant deterioration. Unlike more famous residences, it has not been a priority for restoration, leaving it in poor condition today.

Architectural Layout

The House of Zephyr and Flora follows the standard plan of a Pompeian domus, albeit on a smaller scale than elite residences. Constructed primarily of tufa blocks covered with plaster, it reflects practical Samnite building techniques later enhanced with Roman refinements. Its layout centers around an atrium, typical of Roman houses, with rooms arranged hierarchically. Key features include:

Entrance and Fauces:
The house is accessed from Via della Fortuna Augusta via a narrow hallway (fauces), which opens directly into the atrium. The entrance lacks the elaborate mosaics or inscriptions seen in wealthier homes like the House of the Faun’s “HAVE” greeting, suggesting a more modest status. The fauces likely had simple plaster walls, possibly with faded decorative bands.

Atrium:
The central atrium, a rectangular courtyard open to the sky, served as the house’s social and functional hub. It features an impluvium, a shallow basin for collecting rainwater, which drained into a cistern below. The atrium is of the Tuscan type, with no supporting columns, relying on the roof’s inward slope (compluvium) for structural integrity.
Surrounding the atrium are smaller rooms, likely cubicula (bedrooms) or storage spaces, though their exact functions are uncertain due to damage. The atrium’s walls were once plastered and painted, but most decorations have faded or been removed to museums.

Tablinum:
Opposite the entrance, a tablinum (reception room) likely served as the owner’s office or a space to greet clients, a key function in Roman social life. The tablinum would have opened to the atrium and possibly a small garden at the rear, though its precise layout is debated due to erosion. It may have contained some of the house’s notable frescoes, discussed below.

Garden and Peristyle:
At the rear, a modest hortus (garden) provided light and air, a common feature in smaller Pompeian homes. Unlike the grand peristyles of elite houses, this garden lacks a colonnade, reflecting the house’s simpler design. It may have contained basic plantings or a small shrine, though no such features are well-preserved.
The garden’s size is limited, suggesting it served practical rather than ornamental purposes, possibly for growing herbs or vegetables.

Ancillary Rooms:
Additional rooms off the atrium and garden likely included a triclinium (dining room) and service areas like a culina (kitchen), though these are poorly documented due to the house’s state. The absence of evidence for upper floors or extensive workshops suggests a single-story residence focused on family life rather than commerce.

The house’s footprint is estimated at around 200–300 square meters, significantly smaller than the 3,000-square-meter House of the Faun, placing it in the middle tier of Pompeian dwellings. Its compact design and lack of lavish structural features indicate it belonged to a merchant or minor notable rather than an aristocratic family.

Decoration and Artifacts

The House of Zephyr and Flora is best known for its frescoes, which, despite heavy damage and removal to museums, provide insight into its cultural and artistic significance. Painted in the Second Pompeian Style (ca. 80–20 BCE), the frescoes reflect Hellenistic influences adapted to Roman tastes. Key decorative elements include:

Zephyr and Flora Fresco:
The house’s namesake fresco likely depicted Zephyr, the west wind, and Flora, the goddess of flowers, in a mythological scene. Flora, equivalent to the Greek Chloris, is often shown gathering blossoms, sometimes pursued or accompanied by Zephyr, as in Ovid’s Fasti (where Zephyr marries Chloris, granting her floral dominion). The exact composition is unclear, as the fresco was removed to the Naples Archaeological Museum and has suffered degradation.
This scene would have symbolized spring, fertility, and renewal, themes resonant in a domestic setting. Its style likely featured delicate figures against a colorful background, typical of Second Style illusionism, which aimed to create depth and narrative.

Other Mythological Themes:
Additional frescoes included Bacchic imagery (hence “House of the Bacchae”), such as maenads or satyrs, common in Pompeian homes to invoke Dionysian festivity. These may have adorned the triclinium, where dining and socializing occurred.
The “House of the Ship” moniker suggests possible nautical motifs, perhaps a fresco of a vessel or marine life, though no such artwork is definitively documented. This name could also stem from confusion with nearby structures.

Architectural Decoration:
The walls were coated with plaster and painted to mimic marble or architectural elements, a cost-effective way to emulate wealthier homes. Traces of red, yellow, and black pigments suggest a vibrant palette, though most have faded due to exposure.
No mosaics are noted, unlike in grander residences, indicating a focus on painted decoration over expensive flooring.

Artifacts:
Few portable artifacts are recorded, likely due to looting during early excavations. Household items like pottery or tools may have been present but were not systematically cataloged. The absence of statues or luxury goods further supports the house’s middling status.

The removal of frescoes to museums, while preserving them from further decay, has stripped the house of its original ambiance. Early archaeologists’ efforts saved these artworks from total loss, but their detachment from context complicates interpretation.

Function and Social Role

The House of Zephyr and Flora functioned primarily as a private residence, reflecting the lifestyle of a moderately prosperous Pompeian family. Its key roles included:

Domestic Life: The atrium and cubicula housed daily activities—sleeping, eating, and socializing. The tablinum was likely where the paterfamilias conducted business or received clients, reinforcing social ties crucial in Roman society.
Entertainment: The triclinium, adorned with mythological frescoes, hosted dinners where the family displayed its cultural refinement. Scenes of Zephyr and Flora or Bacchic revelry would have sparked conversation, linking the household to Greco-Roman mythology.
Religious Practices: A small lararium (household shrine) may have existed in the atrium or garden, though none is preserved. Such shrines typically honored the Lares (household gods) and ancestors, with offerings to ensure prosperity.
Economic Activity: While not a commercial hub like the House of Verecundus, the house’s location on a busy street suggests possible minor trade or leasing of tabernae (shops) nearby, though no direct evidence confirms this.
The house’s modest scale and decoration suggest it belonged to a merchant, artisan, or lower-tier elite, possibly a freedman or Samnite descendant who adopted Roman customs. Its lack of opulent features contrasts with the ostentatious villas of Pompeii’s richest families, yet its frescoes indicate aspiration to cultural sophistication.

Cultural and Archaeological Significance

The House of Zephyr and Flora offers a window into the middle stratum of Pompeian society, less glamorous than elite residences but more revealing of typical urban life. Its Samnite origins highlight Pompeii’s pre-Roman heritage, while its Roman-era frescoes reflect the city’s integration into Hellenistic and imperial culture. The Zephyr and Flora motif, tied to spring and fertility, underscores the universal appeal of mythological narratives in domestic spaces, connecting Pompeii to broader Mediterranean traditions.

Archaeologically, the house exemplifies the challenges of preservation. Excavated hastily in the 1820s, it suffered from looting and environmental damage—water and wind eroded its plaster and tufa, leaving it a shadow of its former self. Its current state, described as abandoned and dilapidated, contrasts with better-maintained sites like the House of the Vettii, raising questions about prioritization in Pompeii’s conservation. The removal of frescoes, while necessary, disrupts the house’s integrity, making it harder to visualize as a lived space.

Critical Reflection

The house’s multiple names—Zephyr and Flora, Ship, Bacchae—reveal the speculative nature of early archaeology. Without inscriptions, the “Zephyr and Flora” attribution rests on a single fresco’s interpretation, which may overemphasize one theme over others. Could the house have been a multifunctional space, perhaps tied to a specific trade (e.g., textiles or wine) rather than purely residential? The “Ship” name, though vague, hints at possible maritime connections, perhaps reflecting the owner’s profession or a local landmark. The lack of documented artifacts limits our understanding, and the house’s obscurity compared to grander sites may skew perceptions of its importance.

Moreover, the house’s poor condition prompts skepticism about Pompeii’s narrative as a “perfectly preserved” city. Erosion and neglect have erased much of its story, and reliance on museum-bound frescoes risks reducing it to disconnected artworks rather than a cohesive home. Comparing it to better-documented houses like the House of Lucretius Fronto suggests it may have been more vibrant than its ruins imply, urging caution in dismissing it as “minor.”